baleanoptera (
baleanoptera) wrote2009-10-09 11:16 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
the peace prize
Hey! The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to give the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama!
Congrats to all the Americans on my flist.
Congrats to all the Americans on my flist.
no subject
I love Obama, but I feel like this may be a tad premature.
Of course, if it makes Glenn Beck's head actually explode then the world WILL be a better place.
no subject
I'm not a huge expert on how the committee works, but the last few years they've explained that they want the prize to be not just of work already done, but supportive for people trying to change things. So I think this can be taken as the committee lending symbolical support to Obama.
no subject
OTOH, if we needed proof that Obama is restoring a bit of goodwill in the world for us, after 8 years of shame? Done.
no subject
if we needed proof that Obama is restoring a bit of goodwill in the world for us, after 8 years of shame? Done.
Hey, we've always loved you - we just felt a bit awkward saying it with all the Karl Rove's and Donald Rumsfeld's running around. ;P
But seriously, I cannot see this award as anything other than a huge political statement.
no subject
no subject
That's interesting to know! I tend to agree, it feels premature, but on the other hand that statement makes me think it's a refreshing perspective shift to say, we're not going to wait around to applaud a significant body of work which is unanimously approved - instead we're going to encourage change as much as we can, not only with our money but with our cachet and soapbox. So I guess Obama, whether he agrees or not, has a multiplier effect for what the Nobel folks want to say.
I have a mental picture of the Nobel committee deliberating, and they're all, "quick! Let's nominate him now while we can!" :) (And it probably doesn't hurt that he serves to balance out, at least right now, some of the more questionable awardees in the past.)
no subject
I think you put the finger on the reason for the committee's decision there. In the statement and the press conference they kept stating that it was Obama's use of diplomacy and his work with the UN that had been vital in their decision. They also cited his visit to Cairo early in his presidency as exemplary, and I think the wish to highlight that kind of foreign policy was an important factor in the selection.
And it probably doesn't hurt that he serves to balance out, at least right now, some of the more questionable awardees in the past
Hee! I think everyone can agree that the committee has a rather interesting and many-faceted past.
no subject
Of course, if it makes Glenn Beck's head actually explode then the world WILL be a better place.
You know, if even we Obama "fans" are puzzled by this decision, I imagine it will only lend fuel to the idea that the Peace Prize is all totally political and has nothing to do with actual achievements.
Still, he's certainly a better choice than Henry EFfing Kissinger was!!
no subject
Oh definitely, and I even suspect that to some extent that was the idea. This was the first prize to be handed out by the committee's new leader, and unlike the previous one (who was a staunch conservative and a deeply religious man) the new leader is known as a bit of a lefty with a fondness for making big political statements.
he's certainly a better choice than Henry EFfing Kissinger was!
Not the proudest moment in Nobel history that. ;)
no subject
it's just so strange and puzzling! I'm a big fan of President Obama and I still find it weird that they would make this award so soon in his Presidency. What if he doesn't live up to the intentions? So strange!