I agree with the trailer_spot – I thought it was a reference to the American army soldier attitudes. They are like the kings of the land. Plus there is may be a bit of a Biblical reference there. I really liked "Three Kings" at the beginning, but it was far too long.
"Behind Enemy Lines" – I found it to be quite a poor movie, a prime example of why I don't really like Hollywood war films – stereotypes, inaccuracies, etc. But mainly I don't like Hollywood war movies because everything in them is about American soldiers (usually as the great saviors of democracy) and American interests (as if they are the most important), not about the people who actually live in the places that are shown. Also usually all the credit for everything is given to USA.
I also noticed the odd American soldiers/angels reference which was very odd.
no subject
I agree with the trailer_spot – I thought it was a reference to the American army soldier attitudes. They are like the kings of the land. Plus there is may be a bit of a Biblical reference there. I really liked "Three Kings" at the beginning, but it was far too long.
"Behind Enemy Lines" – I found it to be quite a poor movie, a prime example of why I don't really like Hollywood war films – stereotypes, inaccuracies, etc. But mainly I don't like Hollywood war movies because everything in them is about American soldiers (usually as the great saviors of democracy) and American interests (as if they are the most important), not about the people who actually live in the places that are shown. Also usually all the credit for everything is given to USA.
I also noticed the odd American soldiers/angels reference which was very odd.