baleanoptera (
baleanoptera) wrote2009-10-09 11:16 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
the peace prize
Hey! The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to give the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama!
Congrats to all the Americans on my flist.
Congrats to all the Americans on my flist.
no subject
But I can kind of sympathise with the idea that a prize should be some sort of symbolical support and a guidance for future work, but really, saying that you want to change things isn't enough. It's like the well-known Cylon plan. Cynical, moi?
no subject
Cynical, moi?
Hee. Perhaps, but considering how political the Peace Prize has become I think a bit of scepticism is a good thing. To be more specific, I think it is a great thing to have a prize that rewards people working for a better world, but I think that for such a prize to be really valuable it must strive to be as apolitical as possible. Selecting someone like Obama (regardless of how great a person he might be) will be divisive simply because he is a political figure, and a rather prominent at that. Having a peace prize that actually increases the heat in a debate just seems to bring too much irony to the playing field.
That said, I do rather like the idea of having a prize that works as guidance and a ideological parameter - I'm just weary of combining that guidance and ideology with a specific political stance.